Sunday, May 15, 2011

Bill Wilson insigths on AA from a Century 21 vantage point

Imagine if Bill Wilson were here today.  Here are some examples of some of his recorded insights and I invite everyone to consider what Bill W would say to us if he were alive in the 21st century.


“Steps and Traditions represent the approximate truths which we need for our particular purpose. The more we practice them, the more we like them. So there is little doubt that AA principles will continue to be advocated in the form they stand now. If our basics are so firmly fixed as all this, then what is there left to change or to improve? The answer will immediately occur to us. While we need not alter our truths, we can surely improve their application to ourselves, to AA and a whole and to our relation with the world around us…

As we now enter upon the next great phase of AA’s life, let us therefore rededicate ourselves to an even greater responsibility for our general welfare. Let us continue to take our inventory as a Fellowship, searching out our flaws and confessing them freely. Let us devote ourselves to the repair of all faulty relations that may exist, whether within or without.

And above all, let us remember that great legions who still suffer from alcoholism and who are still without hope. Let us, at any cost or sacrifice, so improve our communication with all these that they may find what we have found.” Bill Wilson, ©The AA Grapevine, February 1961



Bill Wilson was not celebrating AA’s 25th birthday; he was concerned with what the next quarter century would look like.  Feel free to google this article to read it word for word.  You will find that he is talking about the 12 Steps leading to a relationship with God.  That was clearly true for him at the time and I am not avoiding the fact that he saw AA and God-consciousness as being a packaged offering to the still-suffering alcoholic.  The concern about agnostics being intellectual hold-outs was still part of his lexicon, although he had softened dramatically from when he penned Alcoholics Anonymous over 20 years previously.



I would ask everyone to ponder what Bill Wilson would be saying in 2011, looking forward to AA’s 4th quarter century.  He would see that absolute belief in God was a minority opinion almost everywhere.  He would have seen that atheism in the USA had tripled since he wrote this in the early 1960s.  He would see that this was no handicap as, from 1975 until now, agnostic meetings have not only asserted their right to autonomy, but these members have for the most part, not let their divergent views slow down their service and fellowship in the mainstream of Alcoholics Anonymous.  He would have non-believer in his home group and he would talk about the Steps and principles of the program with the same identification and ease that he conversed with anyone else.  He would know Buddhists, Taoists and agnostics who, though as spiritual as he, did not use the world “God” in their lexicon.  He would have seen a world that grew to respect freedom of religion but acknowledge that this also meant freedom from religion.  He would have seen the Agnostic 12-Steps and would he not agree as he said above that the principle of AA were equally embraced in this wording as his own words?  Would he be as adamant that everyone take him as literally as our rigid conservative members do?  Or would he be saying, “Dude, chill out; we’re about inclusion, not semantics.” 



Would he look at the Humanist 12-Steps which not only remove the word “God,” but also remove all the Christian morality (moral inventory, character defects et al) and not say, “If this is working for you, keep it up?”   Would he not be glad that SMART Recovery, SOS and Rational Recovery all had track records of helping alcoholics achieve sobriety, but would it hurt him that many had been to AA, grew weary of proselytizing and left because they felt they were unwelcome?



Would he say that the original 164 pages were beyond reproach or would he be shocked that we hadn’t headed his invitation, “We know only a little, more will be revealed?”  I think he would say, “The first writing was a great start, but I bet we can do better. Math hasn’t changed in 75 years but the update kids school books every generation to ensure they are speaking the language of the day and incorporating the newest teaching techniques.  Why hasn’t anyone changed ‘To Wives’ to ‘To Loved ones?”  “Isn’t there a more recent “Doctor’s opinion?”



Other insightful Bill W Quotes:



“Intolerant you say? Well we were frightened. Naturally, we began to act like most everybody does when afraid. After all, isn’t fear the true basis of intolerance? Yes we were intolerant. How could we guess that all those fears were to prove groundless? How could we know that thousands of these sometimes frightening people were to make astonishing recoveries and become our greatest workers and intimate friends?”



“Let us always remember that any society of men and women that cannot freely correct its own faults must surely fall into decay if not into collapse. Such is the universal penalty for the failure to go on growing.”



“Let us never fear needed change. Certainly we have to discriminate between changes for the worse and changes for the better. But once a need becomes clearly apparent in an individual, in a group, or in AA as a whole, it has long since been found out that we cannot stand still and look the other way. The essence of all growth is a willingness to change for the better and then an unremitting willingness to shoulder whatever responsibility this entails.”



“Let us always remember that any society of men and women that cannot freely correct its own faults must surely fall into decay if not into collapse.  Such is the universal penalty for the failure to go on growing.”



“In AA’s first year, I all but ruined the whole undertaking with this sort of unconscious arrogance. God as I understood Him has to be for everybody.  Sometimes my aggression was subtle and sometimes it was crude.  But either way it was damaging – perhaps fatally so – to numbers of non-believers.  Of course, this kind of thing isn’t confined to Twelfth Step work.  It is very apt to leak out into our relations with everybody.  Even now, I catch myself chanting the same old barrier-building refrain: Do as I do, believe as I do – or else.” Grapevine, April 1961



“The well-heard minority, therefore, is our chief protection against an uninformed, misinformed, hasty or angry majority.”  Concept V, The World Service Manual.


2 comments:

  1. More from Bill W

    REMEMBER THE WASHINGTONIANS: It is an historical fact that practically all groupings of men and women tend to become more dogmatic; their beliefs and practices harden and sometimes freeze. This is a natural and almost inevitable process…. But dogma also has its liabilities. Simply because we have convictions that work well for us, it becomes very easy to assume that we have all the truth….This isn’t good dogma; it’s very bad dogma. It could be especially destructive for us of AA to indulge in this sort of thing. (Wilson, 1965/1988, p. 333)

    Tradition One:
    “No A.A. can compel another to do anything; nobody can be punished or expelled. Our Twelve Steps to recovery are suggestions; the Twelve Traditions which guarantee A.A.'s unity contain not a single ‘Don't.’ They repeatedly say ‘We ought . . .’ but never ‘You must!’” (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions p129)

    Tradition Nine:
    “It is the difference between the spirit of vested authority and the spirit of service, two concepts which are sometimes poles apart”. (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, p174)

    Tradition Three:
    “Why did A.A. finally drop all its membership regulations? Why did we leave it to each newcomer to decide himself whether he was an alcoholic and whether he should join us? Why did we dare to say, contrary to the experience of society and government everywhere, that we would neither punish nor deprive any A.A. of membership that we must never compel anyone to pay anything, believe anything, or conform to anything? The answer, now seen in Tradition Three, was simplicity itself. At last experience taught us that to take away any alcoholic's full chance was sometimes to pronounce his death sentence, and often to condemn him to endless misery. Who dared to be judge, jury, and executioner of his own sick brother?” (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions pp140-141)

    ReplyDelete
  2. “The Soul of Sponsorship” chronicles the letters and relationship between Father Ed Dowling and Bill Wilson. In this book Bill Wilson is quoted as saying sobriety, not spirituality is AA’s purpose:
    Bill, "It must never be forgotten that the purpose of Alcoholics Anonymous is to sober up alcoholics. There is no religious or spiritual requirement for membership. No demands are made on anyone. An experience is offered which members may accept or reject. That is up to them."
    Reminded by We Agnostics of Indianapolis http://www.indyweagnostics.com
    “It would be unrealistic to assume that all A.A. members are spiritually inspired. Many, too, are not committed to a formal body of religious doctrine. But innumerable A.A. members—including those of no orthodoxy—say they have experiences the transforming power of sharing, caring, trust and love."

    And, “...the A.A. program of recovery is based on certain spiritual values. Individual members are free to interpret these values as they think best, or not to think about them at all.”
    From “Members of the Clergy Ask About Alcoholics Anonymous" First printed 1961, updated 1996

    ReplyDelete